July 14, 2020
Read More

View license private bool WaitForExit(int milliseconds) { //blogger.com("WaitForExit - time: {0}ms", milliseconds); // Workaround for a bug in which some data may still be processed AFTER this method returns true, thus losing the data. You can specify blogger.comte for milliseconds, and blogger.comrExit(Int32) will behave the same as the WaitForExit() overload. If you pass 0 (zero) to the method, it returns true only if the process has already exited; otherwise, it immediately returns false. I want to wait for a process to finish, but blogger.comrExit() hangs my GUI. Is there an event-based way, or do I need to spawn a thread to block until exit, then delegate the event myself? c#.net winforms user-interface asynchronous  Share. Improve this question. Follow.

Process WaitForExit with a timeout will not be able to collect the output message. – SimpleBasics
Read More

Definition

7/17/ · blogger.com(); blogger.comrExit(); Once I call this through another application the process is hanging. Then I gave a time out of 5 seconds and now it works fine. But I need to find a better way of fixing this issue as this timeout value can be dependent on the system resources and the amount of input application has to process. 4/11/ · blogger.comrExit() hangs forever even though the process has exited in some cases # Open madelson opened this issue Apr 11, · 32 comments Open @stephentoub perhaps a solution would be for the process streams to support cancellation / timeout. If they did, then something could be set up where the process exiting cancels any. I want to wait for a process to finish, but blogger.comrExit() hangs my GUI. Is there an event-based way, or do I need to spawn a thread to block until exit, then delegate the event myself? c#.net winforms user-interface asynchronous  Share. Improve this question. Follow.

The right way to run external process in .NET (async version) · GitHub
Read More

External Processes

7/17/ · blogger.com(); blogger.comrExit(); Once I call this through another application the process is hanging. Then I gave a time out of 5 seconds and now it works fine. But I need to find a better way of fixing this issue as this timeout value can be dependent on the system resources and the amount of input application has to process. 11/15/ · An alternative approach is to call WaitForExit and supply a timeout. The timeout is specified using an integer argument that defines the maximum number of milliseconds to wait. If the external process terminates within this period the method returns true . The WaitForExit()()() overload is used to make the current thread wait until the associated process terminates. This method instructs the Process component to wait an infinite amount of time for the process to exit. This can cause an application to stop responding.

Waiting for a Process to Exit
Read More

Your Answer

4/11/ · blogger.comrExit() hangs forever even though the process has exited in some cases # Open madelson opened this issue Apr 11, · 32 comments Open @stephentoub perhaps a solution would be for the process streams to support cancellation / timeout. If they did, then something could be set up where the process exiting cancels any. 1/23/ · // Creates task to wait for process exit using timeout: var waitForExit = WaitForExitAsync (process, timeout); // Create task to wait for process exit and closing all output streams: var processTask = Task. WhenAll (waitForExit, outputCloseEvent. Task, errorCloseEvent. Task); // Waits process completion and then checks it was not completed by timeout: if (await Task. 7/17/ · blogger.com(); blogger.comrExit(); Once I call this through another application the process is hanging. Then I gave a time out of 5 seconds and now it works fine. But I need to find a better way of fixing this issue as this timeout value can be dependent on the system resources and the amount of input application has to process.

Process:WaitForExit() not waiting
Read More

If you are using blogger.comrExit with a timeout, then it is the culprit. blogger.comrExit with a timeout is known to create issue when we have some parallelism in place and we are trying to execute say the same process multiple times in parallel or many different processes in parallel. The way to get out of this is to wait for the process. You could call blogger.comrExit, passing the appropriate timeout. This way you won't need to use your own check to see whether the process is still running. . 7/17/ · blogger.com(); blogger.comrExit(); Once I call this through another application the process is hanging. Then I gave a time out of 5 seconds and now it works fine. But I need to find a better way of fixing this issue as this timeout value can be dependent on the system resources and the amount of input application has to process.